So I am using this notebook as my primary work tracking notebook. I use a personally modified form of the bullet journal method that uses most of the same elements. I also primarily use a fountain pen for most of my work uses. The first thing I would say about this notebook is that it's very well suited for the task of being a 'daily carry' notebook. The binding is decent enough, and the front cover seems to be tough enough to withstand most abuse. Although I do use it in a Kokuyo Systemic cover (which fits perfectly btw), it appears to be sturdy enough to use without a cover. The second thing about the book is the binding. I am really picky about my bindings because I hate when paper bubbles or flaps. This is the primary reason for knocking off one star of the overall rating. The binding, although sturdy, is rather stiff. You will have to hold pages down at the top and the bottom while writing them. You can also use the butterfly clip method that some like to use to keep pages from bubbling or pushing up from the rest of the pages. It isn't awful, but it isn't as sturdy as a Rhodia web notebook after folding the pages down. The other thing that drives me totally bonkers is the very first 'page' you have after you open up the cover. It has this purple page for an index. First of all, the page is purple which matches nothing about the notebook at all. Secondly, it looks like it is glued onto the binding because I don't see a matching 'purple' page for the very last page in the notebook. Thirdly, you have to fold it down to even write on it as it seems to be glued partially to the front cover. Fourthly, the 'index' section is a grid of lines that only uses the bottom 1/2 of the paper. Since I index often and a lot in my notebooks, it really renders this first 'index' page useless for me, but your use may conform to their format. There are not any page numbers in the notebook, so you will have to end up writing your own. It is a disappointment they didn't number the pages, but I have grown accustomed to not having them as not many manufactures put them on there. The third thing is the paper quality. The paper quality is quite good. Although I have to admit that I mostly use an extra fine twisby eco on it, so feathering and show/bleed through is kept at a minimum by the very nature of the pen. Using that, I see no bleed through. I also see VERY little show through with this fine of a nib. You can't make out that there is something written on the other side of the page. I don't write on the left/backside of notebook pages often, and only do that in order to add additional notes that I missed on the other side to go along with my tracking on the right side of the notebook. The only bleed through I have seen are a few times where I have written with different wider nibs, and ONLY where ink has pooled up pretty thickly. This was only done once with a Pilot fine point Custom Heritage 92 using Diamine Red Dragon ink. (I was drawing a box on the page, and where two lines intersected, a bunch of ink pooled up at that spot.). However the bleed through was very minimum and didn't even make the back of the page unusable. The paper is very slick as well. In fact, I find it slicker, more shiny, and more white than most of the Rhodia paper. One disadvantage with this is the dry time which, in my opinion, is a little longer than the standard Rhodia paper. The 'feel' of the paper is smoother than Rhodia as well. It is probably closer to HP premium 32# laser paper as far as 'feel' and smoothness goes. However, the shading on this will blow the HP paper out of the water. All of the inks I've tried seem to do an excellent job at shading in my opinion. Even the primary ink (Private Reserve Sherwood Green Quick Dry) that I use in this notebook I have gotten to shade, and it hardly ever shades anywhere. Apache Sunset also looks very good on this paper with a medium Visconti palladium dream touch nib. The forth think is the grid marks. The grid is a hairline grey line which is very sharp. The only thing here that may be distressing for OCD people is that the grids on the very edges of the paper (the last square on the left and the right) isn't a full square. It is about a half square on the last column (at least mine was) of the edges, and in the middle where the binding is, you will see about a 3/4 of a square. At the top and bottom you will see about a 1/2 square. Most Rhodia paper is the same way, so if you don't go crazy with those notebooks, you should be ok here as well. I will say that I like the thinner grey lines on this one as opposed to the purpleish ones on some of the rhodia ones.